Older generations never saw the fruits of their sins.
Targeted Readership: All
Theme: The W!tchy War on Masculinity
Length: 1,400 words
Reading Time: 8 minutes
Although my grandmother would never use the words ‘Feminism’ or ‘power’, in her own words she told me that back in her day, she saw society change for the benefit of women, and that Feminism liberated women and gave them dignity.
I had to ask her…
“When Feminists claimed that men and women were (or should be) ‘equal’, did they mean moral equality, political equality, socioeconomic equality, Sexual Market Value (SMV) equality, or Marriage Market Value (MMV) equality?”
She pushed her glasses up and looked at me inquisitively, but said nothing.
“If it was about moral equality, then perhaps you’re right. But that’s not because of Feminism. It’s because men started to reject Feminism, leaving women to start taking responsibility for themselves, and this didn’t happen en masse until the U.S. splintered and spoiled in the 2020s. Thanks to the Red Pill era, Men woke up to the ever present reality of Persistent Female Narcissism (PFN), which was naïvely called “solipsism” at that time, and “hysteria” back in the early 20th century, but has since been added to the DSM as a sex-linked disorder. Men responded by becoming less family and civic minded, and more Black Pilled / MGTOW / nihilistic. Men started going away on looong vacations overseas in search of femininity and masculine sanity, which was called ‘Passporting’ back then. Black men who took this route were called ‘Passport Bros’ and the Wh!te men who did this were scorned as ‘Neo-Colonizers’. When a critical plurality of men started doing this, then all the Strong Independent Wimmin suddenly realized that they’d need to work for their entire lives in order to fulfill and retain their ‘Independence’. Then and only then did they slowly learn to appreciate all the great benefits and blessings women once had under the Glorious Patriarchy — the same blessings which they summarily threw away in their pursuits of sexual perversion. Even then, very few women ever realized that they could get everything they wanted and more by attaching themselves to one man and cloying themselves as a submissive ‘Trad-Wife’, or any wife at all for that matter. Instead they fooled around with cohabitation and having children out of wedlock — anything to keep one foot on the carousel. All this suggests that women might, just might, be displaying a wee tad bit more moral agency now than they ever did back when you were a spring chick hopping around the Hippie commune.”
She jerked up straight and looked straight at me with an indignant gaze. I took this as an indication that she was in a cognizant mood for a change, so I continued.
“If the argument only concerned political equality, I guess most people might agree with those Feminists. But looking back on history with crystal clear hindsight, we know that all the rhetoric about political ‘rights’ were merely a mass bluff put on by the controlling elites. As I recall, there were some who tried to make the public aware of this by touting the concept of ‘Mass Formation Psychosis” during your generation’s last power play before retirement — that hamfisted grab for open control through martial law, AKA the C0v!dian C0nsp!r@cy. But most people dismissed this as pseudo-science so that they could get back to their other, more hypnotizing pseudo-sciences. Moreover, the notion of political equality was nothing more than an artificially popularized mythos intended to keep the masses preoccupied with a fabricated intersexual cultural war, and thereby distract them from ever noticing their grab for world power. In reality, women had the vote for more than a century, and the whole world went to hell during that time. Women grew less and less happier until they were downright miserable.”
“Until… The God Emperor Trump took office and exposed their schemes, or ‘drained the swamp’ as he put it. When the veil was removed from peoples’ eyes, women grew tired of the daily 9 to 5 grind and wanted to return to the home and hearth, and Men (and some women too) began hankering for the 19th amendment to be repealed.
“Grab ’em by the p_ssy” was just a front hole in the dyke.
Her mouth was gaping open at this point. I went on.
“It wasn’t about socioeconomic equality, because in the early 2020s, women surpassed men in nearly every metric; earnings, educational level, longevity, media presence, living standards, quality of life, and so on. The only things women did not surpass men in were things like the crime rate, homelessness, and su!c!de. And yet, women were still crying “Victim!” and persecuting men for just being alive, for ‘gazing’ at them, and for not giving them Moar!
“Equality?!? Hmph!
Her indignation changed to consternation. Spittle began to drool from the left corner of her mouth.
“Neither was it about Sexual Market Value (SMV) equality.
“I mean, if all men are equal, then why can’t women just choose one. Any one will do, since they are ‘equal’. Right?
“And if men are ‘equal’ to women, then why did women say, “Where are all the good MEN?” ? Why didn’t they say, “Where are all the good lesb!ans?”?
She hiccupped and wiped her mouth with a tissue.
“And it wasn’t about MMV equality either.
“I mean, if men and women were equal, then why did women ask men, “What can you contribute to a relationship?” (Or, “…bring to the table”, as people said back then in their debased, distrustful, and self-centered transactional mindset.) Meanwhile, women were gravely offended when men asked the same question of them, seemingly unaware that if a woman offered a man something of value, oh, say, like kindness, submissiveness, sweetness, or even nothing more than simply a daily sammitch, then this might have raised her MMV and allowed her to “stick the landing” as St. Dalrock wrote, or maybe even land a better man. But those women were too narcissistic to do even that!
“No. All these arguments about ‘equality’ were a false flag. Looking back on the demise of the U.S. of A., now we can see where all these arguments led — a not-so-benevolent Gynocratic dictatorship over a less-than-civilized Jungleland.
Grandma huffed and put down her plastic sports bottle of strawberry Ensure so that she could wave her bony finger. (She hasn’t been out jogging since she broke her hip in 2026.)
“You entitled ungrateful brats don’t know how good we had it back then. It’s your spoiled generation that has ruined Barbie land!”
Ahhh… The clueless Projection of advanced PFN and dementia in the elderly has become the defining characteristic of their generational cohort.
There was no sense in arguing with her any further, so I began pushing her wheelchair back to the clinic and simply replied,
“OK, Boomer.”
Readers must surely know this is satire, but it IS based on my own experience. Unfortunately, this conversation never happened. My grandmother wasn’t a Boomer, but a member of the Greatest Generation. “Her day”, which she spoke of, was not the 1970s, but the late 1930s to the early 1950s. She didn’t see any connection between her notions of feminism and the fact that her husband was unable to tolerate her disgust for sexual relations and her quarrelsome daily insistence on her own ‘discretions’, ‘rights’, and ‘freedoms’. She didn’t understand why he left her for his secretary, a buxom, chirpy, and garrulous woman 12 years younger than herself. She didn’t understand why her husband filed for a divorce in 1957, shoving my father (who was 14 years old at the time, which is the worst age to experience parental divorce) into a bleak existence that he never fully recovered from. In her mind, it was all his fault; “Men are bad” and “All men want is sex, Sex, SEX!” She felt sorry for herself, “victimized by the Patriarchy” as some leftover feminists might say today.
She died in 1989, so she didn’t live long enough to see her son being frivorced by his wife in 1994. She didn’t get to see her granddaughters ruin themselves on the carousel and have children OOW, and her grandsons also stripped by divorce. She didn’t get to see her sins being passed down to the next generation. Thus, she never made the connection to this either.
Moreover, my grandmother never got to see any connection between her notions of feminism and the current fruits of its culmination which are required to prop up the Feminine Imperative — ressentimented virtues as vices, the postponement and debasement of marriage, the bimbofication of women, increased promiscuity, abortion, an implosion of trust between the sexes, divorce, and the destruction of the family.
Ignorance is bliss, but it is hell for the grandchildren.
Merry CHRISTmas~!
Related
- Σ Frame: The Evolution of Feminism as a Series of Cultural Movements (2018/1/15)
- Σ Frame: The Blue Pill, Feminism, and Sin (2018/10/16)
- Σ Frame: Gynapotheosis (2021/4/21)
- Σ Frame: The Sexual De-Evolution (2021/7/28)
- Σ Frame: A Gynocentric Society Inhibits Female Agency (2022/12/9)
- D. Bradley: A holiday message to men (2023/12/24)
ArchAngel
caterpillar345
Soup Sandwich
Lexet Blog
Novaseeker
Oscar
Red Pill Apostle
Jack
thedeti
Σ Frame 
Even the few survivors of those past generations who did live long enough to see the poisonous fruits of their sins reacted with the typical “not MY fault!” attitude. While we know that The Almighty will disabuse them of that attitude in a most unpleasant manner come Judgment Day, it is still maddening to witness the utter lack of accountability or remorse, however much we know them to be mostly incapable of either.
LikeLiked by 6 people
I reacted by postponing at age 25. I didn’t start looking into relationships again before age 35. Was well worth it due to all the additional experience and knowledge. However marriage so overloaded with legal implications, that you can actually impoverish your family by signing the certificate. While there are extensive alimony liabilities (going both ways), “single mothers” get grants and tax rebates.
Diligent tax planning is the bread of butter of any freelancer. The churchian life script looks like the minimum income maximum taxation option to me, instead of the opposite. So when a family is in the cards, I will optimize there for sure.
LikeLiked by 2 people
What is the age difference between you and your woman?
LikeLike
In my late 30s I thoroughly surveyed the 18-24 age bracket for several years before settling for 25 in the end. Needless to say that I started in a league I couldn’t even imagine talking to when I postponed at 25. Everything turned out easy and effortless, no BS, no games whatsoever.
During the survey I kept the bedroom dead to filter out my preferred demographic. That strategy built my reputation opening even better options down the line. Assortative mating is real. When I hit a match my whole social network was rooting for their couple long before Tingles hit. Nobody cared about age, because things were just looking right to everyone around.
The advantage of being of age is that sexual authority is just assumed and expected. Exactly nobody confuses a single adult man with an adolescent women-pedestalizing guy friend.
The key was and is keeping an outcome-independent mindset the whole time treating things as developing dynamically and adjusting, reacting and regrouping accordingly instead of following a static plan, as no plan survives first contact.
LikeLike
Why 25 in the end? I’m surprised to hear that you apparently had success with the 21-and-under crowd. At 29, I regrettably find myself most attracted to that group, but they generally think that I’m too old. I did talk to a 19-year-old earlier this year, but she was stiff and unable to take a playful joke.
LikeLike
The 25 happened to compatible, which is the most important criteria after all. While especially the 19s were very lighthearted and fun, LTR viability wasn’t really there. Single and happy with themselves is not something you meet very often in that age range.
ALL men are most attracted to the 18-24 crowd, so it’s no surprise you are too. At 29 you’re just not as attractive as men in their late 30s. There is still a large percentage of young women who would never consider dating older guys, but they are still attracted to men, who just got it “figured out”. These men get the most number of messages from women at dating platforms as studies show:
https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aap9815
I distinctively remember how different my experience was in my 30s than in my 20s: You gracefully deal with her fumbling through the process, no you longer fumble yourself. You don’t get confused by how women are slaves to their hormones and act differently through their cycle. You just know how to be persistent without begging for attention. You don’t need validation and just hold your frame. You pass all her reproductive fitness tests easily and effortlessly. You are independent of the actual outcome.
Note how this has nothing to do with typical churchian’s criteria like “having a well paying job”, “owning a house” or “being intentional for marriage”, PSALM and other BPs they serve. Instead I’m just communicating “It’s okay to be a woman with me”, unmoved by female nature, while demanding respect and shutting down nagging.
Before my current LTR came to pass, I mastered many early failure modes, I would had got stuck on a decade earlier. I knew when to start the pair-bonding process (Peak Tingles, not too early, not too late) and how (helping her maximizing quality time while keeping my space). As a result my girlfriend molded herself to me up to the point of replicating my idiosyncrasies.
Pair-bonding is the necessary ingredient for functioning long-term relationships and a woman’s ability to do so diminishes strongly with age. This is the reason why a 30+ demanding to respect “her ways” will never be with a committed high value man. It’s not just her physical attractiveness, it’s her inability to adjust to him, so he has to adjust to her. And no man my age has to do this and wants to do this. They are either already with the pair-bonded wife of their youth, or just start to date youth like I did.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I appreciate the insight, thank you. Personally, I believe that I would benefit from remaining single for a while longer, and might recapture the enthusiasm for a LTR that I had in my younger days. At the same time, I don’t want to pass up good options and potentially be left with none later in life. As you said, a large percentage of women don’t want guys who are significantly older.
I’m curious to know how you met the smaller percentage of women. Dating services? Social network? There are young women at my church, but if they are interested at all, you can pretty much bank on being blocked by TPTB. I think one would have much better odds at a megachurch, where there is less oversight.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just starting talking to them, there is no reason not to. I talked to young Evangelicals for years, which also improved my options, despite them obviously not being available whatsoever to an outsider. Evangelical churches tend to have lots of activities. Participate and run into options continuously.
A real life social network is crucial to my professional craft, so at some point I expanded it into various churches naturally, and that was where I ran into my LTR. Happened to be from a mainline church I never visited. While the TPTB didn’t care much about non-members, the younger “churchies” being already enthusiastic about me (while never considering dating a non-member of their club) was enough to make pre-selection perfect.
As a matter of fact, you need game even for women you will never land, because you need them for your support network. At least in that closed-off circles I built that network completely new from scratch. At the same time there is no “enthusiasm” for LTR at my age and this helps with outcome independence.
I vividly remember the validating aspect of having a hot girlfriend in my 20s. It isn’t there anymore, I got used to being around hot young women all the time and the burdens of a relationship counter the excitement really well. Instead my focus is on other qualities.
LikeLike
Nice, Jack!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the gift, Jack. And Merry Christmas, men!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ho ho ho!
Merry Christmas!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you.
You meant your post for our training and entertainment I assume. However, I am curious if you were aware of the dark tone/implication, prior to writing it, or did you discover this impact only after reading a first draft?
The tone/implication I am referring is a description of my response to it, and when I got to the end, all I can think about is the indictment of the church, not of “grandmas.”
It’s like Nathan’s story to David about the rich owner stealing someone’s lone sheep, and how it turned out about David’s sin.
In this case, how awful and faithless it is of the church to not tell stories like this to congregations in order that the women would have an opportunity to repent and to avoid the eternal consequences so well laid out in the satire.
LikeLiked by 3 people
If the “church” wasn’t just a heavily disguised business walking on eggshells in fear of its largest customer base, then it would be force feeding truth to women and encouraging them along a path of repentance. As long as the “collection plate” model of operations prevails, such will never happen.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Surfdumb,
That my short fiction caused you to reflect on the shortcomings of the church is a somewhat frightening portent. This post never touched on the church. You got that impression from beyond.
How does the church relate to this story? Not sure what you mean by ‘tone’. Are you drawing an analogy between the grandmother in my post and the church?
In fact, my grandmother was a deaconess in a Presbyterian church. Imagine a divorced feminist woman as a deaconess! It’s one of the reasons my father left that church as a young man and joined a Baptist church. However, she did have a heart for the disabled and elderly and she was quite faithful in helping them.
LikeLike
Merry Christmas my Brothers! Thanks again Jack!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not an analogy because the church doesn’t talk about being better off as equals to Christ. More like a parallel — grandma’s light is about to go out (due to age), and the church’s light could be snuffed out because it left grandma alone.
The church does well at comforting the afflicted, but since they apparently see women as victims of their loving and pure nature, the church doesn’t include women when they try to afflict the comfortable.
Your post left me in a similar mood to a J. Vernon McGee Christmas sermon I heard while driving yesterday. When I hear, or read something obviously true, then it just leaves everything else exposed as lame and sickly.
The on-topic portion starts at about 20 to 21 minutes. Goes about 15 minutes. I haven’t listened to the last 10 minutes yet.
J. Vernon McGee: Christmas in the Garden of Eden
LikeLike
Re:
The official framing of the mass formation (or mass formation psychosis) “phenomenon” is misleading and wrong in terms of what the whole true reality is. The false hope-addicted psychologists and their acolytes want you to believe this is “just some temporary occasional” madness by the masses when it is but a spike of a CHRONIC madness going on for aeons with “civilized” people.
http://www.CovidTruthBeKnown.com (or https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html)
One of these mainstream psychologists who have been spreading this whitewashed reality, Dr. Desmet, also fails to see that the PLANNED C0v!d Psyop is a TOTALLY deliberate ploy because he doesn’t think (after more than 1 year, 2 years, even 3 years, into this total PLANNED scam!) it’s ALL intentionally sinister as he stated in a prior podcast (this makes him witting or unwitting controlled opposition).
In the May of 2022 podcast with James Corbett he stated that “some people tend to overestimate the degree of planning and intentions” (behind the COUNTLESS, VERIFIABLE, FULLY INTENTIONAL, FULLY PLANNED atrocities by the ruling tribe of psychopaths over the last century alone) and see all of it as being PLANNED which Desmet called “an extreme position” … Sound logical thinking is “extreme” and therefore false and sick in his demented delusional view!
This all means Desmet is ALSO a member of the masses of lunatics, an ACTIVE CARD-CARRYING MEMBER of mass formation!
If you have been injected with C0v!d jabs / bioweapons and are concerned, then verify what batch number you were injected with at this link.
LikeLike
Pingback: Summary of the W!tchy War on Masculinity | Σ Frame
Pingback: 1. The Law of Sowing and Reaping | Σ Frame
Pingback: Market Dynamics of the Hustle Economy | Σ Frame
Pingback: The Ways of Women Around the World | Σ Frame