Women are the Spiritual Paragon of a Society

Readership: Christians;
Author’s Note: This post was cowritten by Lexet and Jack.
Reader’s Note: Gynapotheosis: (from Greek) gyn: woman; apotheosis: the ideal example; epitome; quintessence; the elevation or exaltation of a person to the rank of a god.

“Feminist Christianity is heretical: You can judge a church [or a society] by the state of the young women in it.”

Dark Brightness: Around the Foul Rainbow. (2021 April 22)


“A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.”

Based on this aphorism, this post presumes that the nature and character of women in a society are the epitome of that society. The women of a culture represent the pleasure and pain, the best and the worst, and the strengths and the weaknesses of that culture. Thus, women can be seen to be a small sampling of a society.

Under a previous post, Ed Hurst made the following assertion about the behavior of women.

“If you think about it, you’ll find that what Red Pill lore says about women in particular is reflected to some degree in Old Testament law and custom regarding women.  They share underlying assumptions about how women behave [or should behave] in social situations.”

So… let’s review what the Bible says about women and think about this.

The Intervention of the Sabine Women, by Jacques Louis David (1798).

Women in the Old Testament

Throughout the Old Testament, where judgment is pronounced on a society, society’s sins are often compared to the sins of a prostitute.  (The book of Revelation makes this analogy as well).  Not only that, but apostasy is regularly compared to prostitution.  Read through Hosea, Ezekiel, Isaiah, or Lamentations.

When speaking of Nineveh, the Lord says,

“All because of the many harlotries of the harlot, the charming, the mistress of sorceries, who sells nations by her harlotries and families by her sorceries. ‘Behold, I am against you’ declares the Lord of hosts, ‘and I will lift up your skirts over your face, and show to the nations your nakedness and to the kingdoms your disgrace…
Behold, your people are like the women in your midst! The gates of your land are opened wide to your enemies; fire consumes your gate bars…” ~ Nahum 3:4,5,13 (NASB)

It is interesting to think that a typical young woman in a society is a representation of the spiritual character of that society.  The indications of this analogy do not bode well for western society, as most young women have completely given themselves over to sexual immorality and Feminist ideologies.

Now lets look at some OT verses that describe what life under God’s judgment for disobedience looks like.  In Isaiah 3, it is prophesied that God will remove Jerusalem and Judah…

“…and I will make mere lads their princes, and capricious children will rule over them…
…the youth will storm against the elder, and the inferior against the honorable… …their oppressors are children, and women rule over them.  O My people!  Those who guide you lead you astray and confuse the direction of your paths.”

In verses 16 on, the Lord describes the behavior of the daughters of Zion:

“…because the daughters of Zion are proud and walk with heads held high and seductive eyes, and go along with mincing steps and tinkle the bangles (anklets) on their feet…”

As a result of their behavior, the Lord pronounces judgment and punishment in verses 17-26.

The Rape of the Sabine Women, by Giambologna (1582).

Women in the New Testament

In the New Testament, the word of God is incredibly clear about gender roles.

In 1 Timothy 2:9-10, women are instructed to…

“…adorn themselves with proper clothing, modestly and discreetly, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly garments, but rather by means of good works, as is proper for women making a claim to godliness.”

The next verse states:

“A woman must quietly receive instruction with entire submissiveness.  But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet.  For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve…”

See also Ephesians 5 and 1 Peter 3 (NASB).

Elsewhere in the New Testament, older women are instructed to be…

“…reverent in their behavior, not slanderers, not malicious gossips nor enslaved to much wine, teaching what is good, so that they may train the young women to love their husbands, to love their children, to be sensible, pure, workers at home, kind, to be subject to their own husbands, so that the word of God will not be dishonored.” ~ Titus 2:3-5 (NASB).

That word “reverent” deserves attention.  No one knows what it means anymore because we have forgotten its practical application.  Voddie Baucham gave an excellent sermon on this topic.

Essentially, this is what you don’t find today.

Hamstrung Hamstering

While many modern evangellyfish/churchians support these characteristics of women on the basis of scripture, there remains the fact that most women in the church have scant regard for the practical application of these virtues. When they argue that these instructions are only for behavior inside of the congregation, this modern interpretation does not make sense.  It would create open and obvious hypocritical behavior, whereby immodest clothing is acceptable outside of the congregation, but not within. If this interpretation were applied, then it would render church little more than a fantasy cosplay with an emphasis on pseudo-holiness semiotics.

When they apply their interpretation to the previous chapter in Titus 1, which discusses the qualifications of overseers and deacons, the cosplay then becomes a circus with a ringleader.  Are those standards discussing only the behavior within a congregation?  It cannot be. Elders/overseers must have a good reputation with those outside of the church, “so that he will not fall into reproach and the snare of the devil“. (Titus 1:5-9)

How interesting.

Modern interpretations never say “what is good within the congregation is also good without“.  Instead, their interpretations are only in favor of licentiousness.

Concluding Statements

The Bible uses the parallel analogy of Israel’s relationship with God. This analogy can also be applied to describe every man’s individual relationship to God.

The Blue Pill and everything associated with it (e.g. chivalry, churchianity, feminism, progressivism, individualism, the widespread acceptance of sexual promiscuity, and liberal hegemony in general), is essentially the wayward woman in the analogy.

The greater part of the Red Pill is an attempt to correct this inversion.

The picture of a promiscuous woman assumes that we should already know about the nature of women, and it was intended for us to see ourselves more clearly through this analogy.  But instead, moderns have come to idolize the fallen feminine nature. Consequently, wee as a society have grown so out of touch with God and the spiritual nature of humankind, that wee fail to see the spiritual symbolism, and instead, wew read these things literally as a description of the nature of women.

and wee are fascinated, if not shocked by the impertinence!

The fact that wee (society as a whole) have become so unaware of the nature of women and so offended by the truths conveyed in the Bible and the Red Pill, betrays the underlying truth that wee are blinded by our lusts for pulchritude, sex, and materialism, and have become unaware of the spiritual nature of man in his relationship to God. Instead, wee are only aware of our humble relationship to the gynapotheosis of society, and how far short wee have fallen, not by God’s standards, but according to merciless gynocentric standards.


This entry was posted in Collective Strength, Conspiracy Theories, Convergence, Culture Wars, Discernment, Wisdom, Female Power, Feminism, Freedom, Personal Liberty, Identity, Introspection, Models of Failure, Organization and Structure, Relationships, Self-Concept. Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to Gynapotheosis

  1. professorGBFMtm2021 says:

    Lex,this is my fave post of yours yet here,but my fave of all-time was your ”chris claremont institute fails now&later again because of long ,boring speeches” post at your blog!I just checked out jabbas blog last night,for the first time,before I finaly went to sleep,you see his pushing of purplepilling of ”easily get high self-esteem 9’s&10’s”?I of course,LOLZ for about 5 minutes straight,he thinks hes redpill&a sigma&remember I like this kid!?But he clearly has’nt seen what all of us at jacks has seen over the past 20 years especialy!Where are all those ”9’s&10’s” worth my time?I of course like rollo tomossi better than any of these latter-day puagamer guys who ”don’t get it”like jabba accused the ”manosphere” of!Are we saying theirs tons of 9’s&10’s here or in the U.K.?He knows basic redpill,but not much more!This is a little eccentric,yes?

    Liked by 3 people

  2. redpillboomer says:

    What would be interesting is to compare Western women and their impact on society in the pre-70s decades Vs what they were like and their societal impact respectively in the 70s, the 80s, the 90s, the 00s, and the 2011-2020 decade. I sense a difference between the women of the eighties, when I was a twenty something, and the women of this past decade, not to mention the new one that has just started in 2021.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Jack says:

    “The Blue Pill and everything associated with it (e.g. chivalry, churchianity, feminism, progressivism, individualism, the widespread acceptance of sexual promiscuity, and liberal hegemony in general), is essentially the wayward woman in the analogy.”

    For decades, there has been much discussion about the anti-Christ, and the harlot that rides the beast, described in Revelation, and what the real world embodiment of this could be. It is slowly becoming clear to me that it is most likely to be feminism and the Blue Pill, and everything listed above that is associated with it.

    Liked by 7 people

  4. Elspeth says:

    Love the Voddie Baucham insertion.

    He is still on the wall, saying the politically incorrect thing.

    Liked by 5 people

  5. Pingback: Around the foul rainbow. – Dark Brightness

  6. Red Pill Apostle says:

    The Overton Window it is on full display regarding culture. The church and women are just easy examples to mark how far the window has moved. Fortunately, scripture gives us the standard and bibles are still prevalent so we can see it for ourselves. Men like Voddie still declare the standard and it’s comparing the eternal standard to what is currently pervasive that will help make the next generation of men more careful in choosing a wife. Hopefully, some fathers will have a King Josiah moment (2 Kings 22) about their daughters as well.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Scott says:

    Totally and completely off topic

    For those interested I have precisely one coaching slot available

    Carey on

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Tim says:

    I struggle with Voddie Baucham’s preaching. Typically, I really like the first 5 to 10 minutes of his message, but then, as he digs into the details, his message seems to turn into thinly concealed Blue Pill complementarianism. Even in the video posted above, he doesn’t really seem to believe that evil women exist; just misguided women led astray by evil men. Am I missing something?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jack says:

      Complementarianism is the norm. When preachers stray from that, it is worth noting.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Lexet Blog says:

      He did go on national television to say that Sarah palin was unqualified to be an elected official because she was a woman.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Joe2 says:

      No, you’re not. I liked the beginning of the short clip, but towards the end I also got the impression that women are misguided due to all men not just evil men.

      In particular, he mentions that women dress inappropriately because “they are yearning for male approval.” Sorry, he is just wrong. They dress inappropriately because they want attention not approval. And the attention had better be from the right kind of male (top 20 percent), but rather than acknowledging this trait he blames all men and their lust for the behavior of women.

      Liked by 7 people

  9. Elspeth says:

    Nah. Voddie is solid.

    He doesn’t view women as the sole source of all evil in the world, and as a pastor, there is a solemn responsibility to shepherd the whole flock, not just the men. He is an unapologetic patriarch. He doesn’t believe in women wearing the pants in the home, the church, or the government, as he proved when he blasted the Sarah Palin vice-presidential candidacy on FoxNews.

    O/T: “not the bee” published about 6 pages from his new book (the one I’ve been blogging through). As usual, he’s bucking the narrative, saying the politically incorrect thing:


  10. Pingback: Taking Headship by Force | Σ Frame

  11. Pingback: Why are there so many sexy aggressive women in anime and video game culture? | Σ Frame

  12. Pingback: On Red Pill Awareness | Σ Frame

  13. Pingback: Objective Communications for Effective Group Leadership | Σ Frame

  14. Pingback: The Young Man’s Problem | Σ Frame

  15. Pingback: DeSantis steadies de sinking ship | Σ Frame

  16. Pingback: The Delusion of the Good | Σ Frame

  17. Pingback: On Clarifying a Christian Culture of Attraction | Σ Frame

  18. Pingback: Kyojiro Kagenuma on Women’s Agency | Σ Frame

  19. What’s with the cheetah?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s