Feminism’s Micromanagement of Gynocentric Idolatry.
Length: 2,800 words;
Reading Time: 10 minutes;
About a year ago over at Boxer’s place, fellow Manospherian Derek Ramsey outlined several “problems” with the basic philosophy and implementation of Feminism in his post, The Definition of Feminism (2019 September 21). These problems are listed as follows.
- Equal opportunity is incoherent because men and women are different, not equal.
- The conundrums involved in equality of outcome (as opposed to equality of opportunity).
- In reality, Feminists seek inequality—of opportunity and outcome—favoring women.
- Feminists treat opportunity as a Zero Sum Game.
Here, I wish to point out that it is impossible for these problems to ever be properly resolved because they are intrinsic characteristics of the female mindset. Consider the following.
Rollo’s Cardinal Rule of sexual strategies (2015 January 5) speaks to the first and fourth points by proscribing a Zero Sum Game.
“For one gender’s sexual strategy to succeed, the other gender must compromise or abandon their own.”
Dalrock’s Law addresses the second and fourth points of application. For those new to the ‘sphere, Dalrock’s Law of Feminism (2018 September 6) states,
“Feminism is the assertion that men are evil and naturally want to harm women, followed by pleas to men to solve all of women’s problems.”
Ramsey emphasizes the third point and assumes the fourth point in Derek’s Law of Feminism (2019 October 1), which states,
“The best definition most consistent across all flavors of feminism is the promotion of gender inequality favoring women, that is, female supremacy.”
In summary, the Feminist perspective assumes a Zero Sum Game, not only in terms of opportunity, but for all social interaction. Thus, it may be insightful if we were to examine Feminism, not only as a corrupt social movement, and a hoodwinking philosophy, but also as a large-scale, culture-wide social game.
It is important to note here, this assertion that either the male, or the female, but not both, can “win” by exacting their respective prerogatives in the relationship are primarily the feral views of the female sex. (The Manosphere reached these conclusions by observing females.) In contrast, marriage minded men have the understanding that a Positive Sum Game is necessary, in order to produce a family unit – a long lasting union conducive to deep contentment and the rearing of children. Thus, the demise of marriage is largely a result of women clinging to the Zero Sum Game strategy in their stubborn insistence on winning.
As soon as wimmin realize that they must change their mating strategy for a LTR to work, it becomes tempting for them to either (1) seek to control the man through various means, or (2) bow out of the union and go off seeking a better playing field – especially when responsibilities come home to roost. To carry either of these two options to fruition without subjective impunity, Feminism as a social movement must achieve a multitude of goals, which must be continually coddled and nurtured to bring them to fruition. The most impressive thing about this scheme is that the feminist reach for control extends beyond the clutches of any individual woman, to envelop government policies and societal norms.
The remainder of this post will identify and discuss six of these goals, along with the motivations and Purposes behind the Zero Sum Game of Feminism.
1. The Primary Goal of Gaining Authoritative Control
The goal of gaining authoritative control is perhaps the one goal with the most strategic benefit, because this gives gynocentric idolaters the power to attain various other goals (to be discussed below).
Wimmin often state that men should have control, especially self-control, but this admission is only offered in the context of Chivalrous service to wimmin, so that men can become more capable servants in doing what wimmin want them to do.
The motives behind the primary goal of control have (at least) three main purposes.
- To attain self-sufficiency and self-determination.
- To manipulate the social environment in favor the Feminine Imperative.
- To control men for the purpose of serving feminine interests.
The purpose of the first motivation will become self-evident in the following discussion. Several expressions of the purposes of the second motivation will be discussed in later sections. The third motivation remains as an underlying theme for all intents and purposes.
Of note, this greed for authority and control is alluded to in Jack’s Law of Feminism (2019 January 18):
“Feminism is the assertion and justification of women’s rejection of male authority in favor of an institutionalized social ontology which is dictated by the Feminine Imperative.”
The Feminine Imperative at its worst, is nothing more than solipsistic, hamster fueled, self-willed, self-determination, where carnal pleasure and hedonistic liberty abound.
2. The Goal of Self-Determination
To be fair, a certain amount of self-determinism is necessary for healthy psychological growth and emotional maturity. As such, self-determination is not inherently wrong or immoral, but should rightfully be implemented such to achieve the well-being of the entire family, and not just the wimminz personal interests. Making this adjustment is one of the primary challenges to newlywed wives.
To effectively optimize inherent potential, self-determination needs to be nurtured and disciplined by external loci, such as a father figure, or a structured social environment, like a family or a peer group.
However, many women obviate the more restrictive (and healthier) feedback loops of external reinforcement (e.g. father or church authority) by rebelliously choosing alternative mentors, role models, or peer groups that support her choices. Since herds can be freely chosen, this partly explains women’s continuous pressing necessity to conform to the herd.
Feminism plays on this inherent weakness in encourages wimmin to pursue total self-determination, which denies any duty to comply to expected behaviors and avoids external regulation involving rewards and punishments.
3. The Goal of Sexual Self-Determination
Of specific note, Feminism pushes the idea that wimmin are, or should be, entirely self-determined with respect to sexuality and reproduction.
We don’t need to look too hard to find examples of sexual self-determinism in wimmin.
- Both The Other McCain and Dalrock reported on the rise of Insta-Wh0res (ca. April 2019).
- In a previous post, How much is Virginity worth? (2019 September 6), we reviewed how women are selling their virginity, in essence, trading their MMV for cash. Yet, many of these same wimmin cling to the hope of one day being “married” while they willfully deny how sex and marriage are inextricably linked.
- In another post, Irresponsible Ejaculation Causes Abortion (2019 September 23), we saw one wimminz clear statement about control.
“STOP TRYING TO CONTROL WOMEN’S BODIES AND SEXUALITY. UNWANTED PREGNANCIES ARE CAUSED BY MEN.”
Here, we shouldn’t jump to the conclusion that men are locking their wives and girlfriends in stocks and bonds in a brutal effort to “control” their wimmin. No, this is a statement of Psychological Projection. The sentence in bold reveals Wimminz true motives – to control — and the object of control is men.
Can you imagine? Wimmin want to decide which men can have sex! This is exactly what R.S. McCain was getting at when he wrote, Guy Gets Laid, Feminists Get Angry (2019 September 22).
“Feminists believe that women should have 100% control of sexual activity, that they should be arbiters of who does and doesn’t get laid.”
But McCain doesn’t take it far enough.
- Feminists believe that women should have 100% control of the whole sexual marketplace (SMP).
- Feminists believe that women should have 100% control of the whole procreative process, or the interruption thereof.
- Feminists believe that women should have 100% control of the management and distribution of resources.
- Feminists believe that legislation should be used to implement all of the above.
This quest for control seems to have no boundaries of common decency. Even after admitting that abortion is murder, the author went on to say,
“Abortion is the “cure” for an unwanted pregnancy.”
But truth be told, women already have 100% control of sexual activity! (Except in the cases of Biblical marriage  or authentic rape.) Women are the fundamental Gatekeepers of Sex – arbiters of who gets the key to the golden gyna, and when, and by extension, which men are deemed worthy of procreation.
Yet, this is still not enough to satisfy the Feministas of Flatbush. They also believe women should decide which men can keep their Johnsons! A previous post, Eunuchs of the New Feminist Order (2019 August 31) revealed how some women can be so bold as to assume they have the authority to snip the d!cks off of men. This includes vasectomies, chemical neutering, and any legislation pertaining thereof. 
What if we turned this around, for the sake of equahluty? It would read something like this.
“Women believe that men should have 100% control of sexual activity, that they should be arbiters of who has sex with whom, and when, and who is worthy of procreation.”
Actually, this does seem more appropriate, and of course we know that men would be much more gracious in this matter. But can you imagine the reaction we’d get from wimmin if men decided which women can have sex, and with which men, and when?
4. The Goal of being Free from Responsibility
Another important goal of Feminism is the effective displacement of responsibilities. Since someone must assume the burdensome aspects of responsibility, the Feminist order assigns all responsibility to men, or else, diffuses the responsibilities into big government.
This particular goal of Feminism is wrapped up in Boxer’s Definition of Feminism (2019 January 18):
“A conspiracy against all men and all nations, to offload the individual and collective responsibility for female misbehavior onto men.”
But the problem with displacing responsibility is that for certain issues, you just can’t do it. Every person has his/her own sphere of influence, which no one else can enter. Women want to disabuse themselves of natural consequences and the responsibilities of being free moral agents, and the shame thereof, by shrinking this sphere of influence down to a singularity. This is most often done by expelling from their consciences any sense of personal agency. Wimmin want so desperately to believe that agency and responsibility can be magically transplanted from one gender to another, that this desire takes on the form of solipsistic hamsterbation (AKA psychological dissociation).
An all too common example of how extreme and perverse this disassociation can be, is how women rationalize their need for abortions. As mentioned above, the previous post, Irresponsible Ejaculation Causes Abortion (2019 September 23) illustrated how “a women” made the case that abortion was the result of Menz irresponsibility, NOT Wimminz. This is another classic case of Psychological Projection that we see coming from women way too often.
Men may cause pregnancies, but men don’t make pregnancies unwanted by the woman. Most women who abort their progeny go to clinics on their own initiative… Often without even informing the man. Often to the man’s utter dismay!
All these arguments about abortions, condoms, pills, castrations, vasectomies, laws and legislation, and who is responsible for what, amounts to nothing more than a Pandora’s box of selfishness and sexual sin – which must necessarily be micromanaged for the blame to be shifted.
Even though the related arguments are haywire, the proliferation of these ideas on mass media, and their seductive appeal to the fundamental feminine desire for a gynocentric utopia, have slowly caused them to become more acceptable to the wider public since the 1960’s.
5. The Goal of Remaining Clandestine
One of the primary strategies employed within the Game of Feminism is to obscure the goals and the purposes from the opponents (primarily men, but also other women within her competing social sphere). This has been done with remarkable skill for decades, as these goals have only become apparent to men since the advent of Red Pill consciousness.
The inherent value of secrecy to the feminine psyche is shown in the fact that they go ballistic whenever their secrets are revealed. This is the cause of all the cries of “misogyny“. You see, according to the religion of feminism, introspection and confession are grave sins, but fornicating and child sacrifice, not so much.
Remarkably, even the traditional concept of the Feminine Mystique supports this goal (the original concept, not Friedan’s version). Prior to the late 20th century, women utilized the Feminine Mystique as a cover for their iniquities, and to present themselves in the best possible light, all to secure better prospects of landing a better grade husband, and to elevate their socioeconomic status.
Currently, the PoundMeToo playgame is a classic Plan B for many wayward, agency-lacking wimmin to resort to whenever that vital secrecy has been breached.
The goal of secrecy is not limited to individual wimmin, but is also expressed through selective censorship by MGM news agencies and internet host providers. Recently, it was discovered that the megapowers of the information age have been… [We regret to inform you that because of “user policy violations”, the remainder of this paragraph has been redacted by IA internet bots.]
6. The Goal of Gaining Status and Respect
In the current, postmodern west, women seek to retain an aura of buoyant unpredictability, and pass themselves off as being flighty or emotional. Yet, even so, they demand “respect”, in which “disrespect” is defined (here) as anything that pricks a woman’s ego or deters her self-centered prerogatives. Manospherians know that wimminz idea of “respect” is not the same as a man’s concept of respect, and the female demand for “respect” amounts to little more than a $ћit test.
To top it all off, Feminists must capitalize on their gains by establishing themselves as respectable winners of the Zero Sum Game. Part of this is done by displacing the responsibility, and thus the blame for their errant choices, onto men, as described earlier. But abandoning responsibility also excludes them from the accompanying honor and respect that comes from being responsible.
Dalrock has described this desire for status as a weakness of feminism in his post, Status is a powerful motivator. (2019 September 23). He writes,
“Marriage conveys legitimacy to the children, and status to the woman. The man’s money could be obtained via child support without a wedding, and likewise his assistance (living together would do the trick). For middle class women, there is only one respectable way to babymamahood, and that is by marrying first, and then divorcing whenever it is most convenient after she has the number of children she wants (from that particular baby daddy at least).”
Feminists have been able to dampen the shame of divorce. Laws which facilitate divorce, and the widespread frequency of broken marriages have made it generally acceptable to the larger society. But for some reason, wimmin cannot escape the shame of the humility imposed upon them by being single mothers. Women know this, hence perpetuating their demand for legalized and subsidized abortion.
In sum, respect is fundamentally crucial to men, but it just isn’t in the game plan for women.
Well, not quite. There are a few caveats. For example, I can respect a woman for being able to do this…
The primary purpose of Feminism is to construct a gynocentric utopia, which is essentially an evil idolatry. This utopia, which is only possible in a world without God, embraces secular humanism as their primary religion. Pleasure and The Pride of Life are emphasized as the greatest moral good, even over the sanctity of human life.
To construct this gynocentric dystopia, Feminists must micromanage every detail of life and society, in order to maximize women’s freedoms and pleasure, and minimize their personal responsibility. Within this world of Bizarretta baristas,
bwitchy wimmin control everything, and supposedly get everything they think they want.
“For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft,1st Samuel 15:23 (NKJV)
And stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry.”
What wimmin do not understand is that when they start controlling themselves and taking responsibility for their actions (viz. assuming moral agency), then men will not need to step in and do so in ways that abhorrently countermand wimminz fleshly desire for autonomy and self-determination.
Don’t start one, won’t be one!
- According to 1st Corinthians 7:5, a woman may rightfully expect regular sexual attention from her husband, and she has the authority over his body in terms of his sexual desire and satisfaction. But that is within an intimate relationship between man and wife. Women in general do not have authority over men’s procreative choices or abilities. If a woman willingly lays her body down to be shagged by a man, which is her natural use in marriage, then by nature of the transaction, she is submitting to his authority, and his decision to ejaculate wherever he pleases. If that results in a pregnancy, then she should have accepted that as a possible outcome long before she prostrated herself.
- Deuteronomy 25:11-12 tells us that if a woman ever has a man by the balls (literally, as in a fight), you should cut her hand off, showing her no mercy. The literal application of this verse might be a rare event, but the figurative meaning is evident. Women do not have any authority over men’s fecundity or patrilineage.