Bridal Charades

Modern church marriages are a gynocentric fantasy parade with no practical usefulness to marriage itself.

Readership: Christians
Theme: A Mini-Series on Church Policy and Sacramental Marriage
Length: 600 words
Reading Time: 4 minutes

Throwback to the 50s — Not the 1950s

While I was writing Are Common-Law Marriages the most Biblical? (2023/6/3), I was amused to imagine most grooms would be delighted to have a marriage just like what is described for the Biblical Patriarchs and was enjoyed by most of humanity before the modern age.

Imagine what it would be like. All a prospective groom needs to do is to cut a deal with the bride’s father, celebrate with a joint family supper consisting of grilled meat and spirits, and then get straight down to the butt end of married life — the ins and outs of the bump and grind, followed by a simple life in a clean home with daily meals well-prepared.  No fake frills and no big bills.  Hymens, not diamonds.  No rented limousines having the faint residual odor of the previous customer’s binge barf. No bachelorette’s parties to sweat over.  No bridal showers to be ignored.  It’s not even hard to imagine that most men, having the piquant premonition of pumping prime poon at the end of the day, would willingly forego having a bachelor’s party too.

Having these quaint pleasantries in mind, I had to ask myself, is it right for us to look at the Bible’s descriptions of marriage and conclude that it is archaic, primitive, and unrefined by our modern materialistic accoutrements?  That now we need a pompous ceremony in a grandiose church with stained glass windows and a 200-year-old pipe organ playing canons, cups and crowns, diamond rings and white dresses, plus full legal licensure and the sanction of the church… All to ensure marital sanctity and the blessed continuity of our lineage?  It seems like more trouble than its currently worth.

Or because it is primarily women who want a large, expensive, and extravagant marriage ceremony?  And why?  In the female psyche, a modern marriage is mostly a figment of delusion flushed out in the herd’s affirmation of the bride’s inestimable worth. In reality, it is little more than one more grandiose life experience to be had, and then afterwards the husband is discarded in favor of her “independent” lifestyle supported by alimony.

Or because this charade is now the social norm?  Because if we don’t play charades, then we’re seen as either inelegantly impoverished or mean or stingy and we would be publicly excoriated and humiliated for denying Princess from having her “Big Day” and all that.

What is the Purpose?

As it is, the modern church-based marriage with all its bells and chimes is just another materialistic embodiment of gynocentrism which, like diamond rings and so on, specifically caters to and glorifies brides, wastes extravagant amounts of money placing husbands and fathers in debt, and actually distracts from the actual substance of marriage itself.

The most practical use of a wedding dress in the 21st century.
H/T: Patriactionary

What is the significance of a white wedding dress when only 4% of brides are virgins?  It’s just one more lavish expense that will be worn for one day, and then sold or mothballed for the next few years.

If we are honest, social customs attuned to affirming feminine delusions of grandeur do not contribute to marital stability and sanctification.  The 33% divorce rate among church wed couples is not something to be conserved in our faith tradition.

How about cutting out anything that does not directly contribute to the quality and sanctity of the marital union, and prioritize making sure those things that do are firmly in place?

Related

About Jack

Jack is a world traveling artist, skilled in trading ideas and information, none of which are considered too holy, too nerdy, nor too profane to hijack and twist into useful fashion. Sigma Frame Mindsets and methods for building and maintaining a masculine Frame
This entry was posted in Courtship and Marriage, Fundamental Frame, Gynocentrism, Models of Failure, Models of Success, Paradigms of Religion, Purpose, Sanctification & Defilement, Trust. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Bridal Charades

  1. feeriker says:

    Jack, you send this piece to Churchianity Today and DARE them to publish it.

    Liked by 5 people

  2. whiteguy1 says:

    You ain’t kidding Jack. My sister’s wedding was one for the record books, I would say it was the most ostentatious wedding in our whole family (I would say of our whole family tree, going back 6 generations) and my sister didn’t even want something like it. It was my mother’s idea to take it over the top. She was at the time ‘flexing’ on her current batch of girlfriends so she had to outdo them. Thankfully it didn’t send my parents into debt or the poorhouse but I seem to recall my dad saying the whole thing cost close to $100k, in the mid-2000’s!!!!!

    So as to your point, it’s not only the ‘brides’ that want this stuff, the mothers do too.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Maniac says:

      $100K. Unreal.

      Liked by 2 people

    • 1 day wedding expenses…. or a new car and a down payment for a house.

      The choice is obvious to me, but I guess not to others? People are crazy.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Red Pill Apostle says:

      100k is peanuts … Some of my college friend’s weddings were town social events. The parent’s business associates, partners, and friends were all invited. My best estimate is that some of them cost near $200-250k over 20 years ago. 7 open bar stations, filet, prime rib, strawberry and champagne stations for about 800 people.

      Like

      • @ RPA

        “100k is peanuts … Some of my college friend’s weddings were town social events. The parent’s business associates, partners, and friends were all invited. My best estimate is that some of them cost near $200-250k over 20 years ago. 7 open bar stations, filet, prime rib, strawberry and champagne stations for about 800 people.”

        I guess if their business is making > 1M per year you may not care as much about a 200-250k wedding.

        200-250k wedding on an annual salary less than the wedding would be crazy.

        Like

      • Red Pill Apostle says:

        DS – I was a need based grant kid at an expensive private university. My boss at my campus work study was a grad student and studied the SES of families that attended. In the late 90’s the average family income of a student who attended was $262,000. There were trust fund kids from the Dupont family and the Hunt family, sitting senator’s kids, a former VP’s daughter, you get the idea. The mix of generational family money and high earners was eye opening for a kid who was the sun of a nurse and a carpenter.

        Like

      • Joe2 says:

        Kids whose parent can easily afford $200-250k on a wedding are exactly the types of kids who should be getting married.

        They’ll have a marriage without any financial concerns and their children will be provided with the best of everything from day one. And the family money can then be passed down from generation to generation. They’ll have smooth sailing and a great marriage.

        It’s the “son of a plumber” who marries the girl who works at the hair salon are the couple who will face headwinds and have troubles in their marriage. They’ll save and scrape their money, together with whatever little their parents can give them, so they can afford the down payment on a modest home and live in “Mortgage Heights.” Children will be a financial strain from day one. They’ll have a stressful marriage, troubled children, and soon be headed to counseling and eventually to a divorce lawyer’s office.

        “The wedding at Cana sure seems large, extravagant, and expensive.”
        It sure did and it may very well have been the equivalent of a $200-250k wedding today. It seems the parents could easily afford the wedding at Cana. The couple will be on easy street.

        Like

  3. naturallyaspirated says:

    I love it when the bride who has had several live in boyfriends and partied it up in college thinks the big white dress and princess party is so important.

    What exactly is unique or profound or sacred about this current relationship?

    Liked by 1 person

    • feeriker says:

      If I had dictatorial powers, I think I would declare a law that non-virgin brides (other than widows) would be required to wear see-through whorehouse red dresses at their weddings. Grooms would be required to be naked except for a large sandwich sign reading “THIRSTY SIMP” on one side and “Future Divorce R@pe V!ct!m” on the other.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Bardelys the Magnificent says:

    I mean, if Kim Kardashian can wear a white dress for her third wedding….

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Oscar says:

    The wedding at Cana sure seems large, extravagant, and expensive.

    Like

  6. dave sora says:

    So instead of proposing, then planning, then having a blow out ceremony, just transfer “…with this ring I thee wed…” to the proposal and make that the whole ceremony?

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Pingback: A Concise History of Marriage Regulations | Σ Frame

  8. Pingback: Moral agency and sex define a marriage | Christianity and masculinity

  9. Pingback: What Changes after Marriage? | Σ Frame

  10. Pingback: Commonalities of Successful Marriages | Σ Frame

  11. Pingback: Expectations, Laws, and Policies regarding Marriage | Σ Frame

  12. Pingback: Synopsis of Sacramental Marriage | Σ Frame

  13. Pingback: The Sacred Cow | Σ Frame

  14. Pingback: 2023 Sigma Frame Performance Report | Σ Frame

Leave a comment