Female moral agency is motivated by masculine authority and is destroyed by Feminist equality.
Targeted Readership: Men
Theme: Female Agency and Accountability
Author’s Note: This post is based on Sharkly’s comment under Rollo Tomassi on Female Agency (2022/11/4). Organized, formatted, with links and images added by Jack.
Length: 1,100 words
Reading Time: 6 minutes
Do women have moral agency?
Women have moral agency. God treats them as if they do. Thedeti seems to say that women’s agency is weaker than men’s, and that in the absence of others enforcing consequences on them for their actions, women will usually drift towards following their own emotions, even in contradiction to the moral beliefs they espouse. Women’s moral conduct is generally less rationally decided and more driven by what feels good to them in the moment. Although churches will vehemently deny that, God has ordered His patriarchal earthly hierarchy as if that is clearly the case.
Headship Authority is granted to Men, NOT Women!
God has said,
“You are gods, sons of the Most High, all of you;Psalm 82:6 (ESV)
The Bible teaches that God created men first, preeminent, and in His own image, after His likeness, and showing His glory.
For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman is the glory of man.1 Corinthians 11:7 (NKJV)
The Bible also says that wives are ALL to be treated as weaker vessels, which they truly are.
Husbands, likewise, dwell with [your wives] with understanding, giving honor to the wife, as to the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life, that your prayers may not be hindered.1 Peter 3:7 (NKJV)
The church is obfuscating these truths!
The Long Unraveling
So where do we get these silly notions of sexual equality?
The earliest church fathers all unanimously believed and wrote that men alone were in the matchless image of the Most High, while women are not the image of Christ, but are the image of His straying church.
Early church father, Ambrosiaster, wrote,
“Paul says that the honor and dignity of a man makes it wrong for him to cover his head, because the image of God should not be hidden. Indeed, it ought not to be hidden, for the glory of God is seen in the man. […] A woman therefore ought to cover her head, because she is not the likeness of God but is under subjection.”
In the latter fourth century AD, Rome adopted Nicene Christianity as their Imperial religion. To appease forcibly converted Goddess worshippers, the state-coopted Church of Rome then made women into the image of deity so that they could make a woman, Mary, equal to Jesus Christ as a co-redemptrix, and into a substitute goddess whom people could pray to instead of goddesses like their Magna Mater who had been served by the castrated Galli.
The Protestant reformation to some degree forced the roll back of the deification of Mary, within Christendom, however the reforms fell short of also seizing back the “image of our masculine deity” from womankind. Leaving in place the heretical foundation for presumed sexual equality which is the essential foundation and justification upholding the false doctrines of Feminism.
Women’s Agency is Predicated on Men’s Headship Authority
A man can marry well beneath himself and easily remain content with his choice for a lifetime, IF his wife is faithful and treats him reasonably OK. But the bottleneck is that ALL Women are hypergamous. I have not met a single woman who truly and consistently defies hypergamy.
TFM once said that:
“Every woman wants a man she can look up to, and you don’t look up to your equal.”
In all mutually happy and healthy long-term marriages, wives, at least subconsciously, must see their husbands as superior to them, not just by an unmerited divine fiat granting all men an undue rank and commanding their wives to submit to them. But a hypergamously-contented wife willingly submits to her man, whom she most usually sees as worthy of her submission. Honestly, every woman wants to submit herself to a “god”. She wants to submit to a male sex-idol. And that is what God has made you!
The presumption of sexual equality will always agitate against all women’s innate hypergamy. If men are not all held to be categorically superior to women, then all male headship is then only merited in the natural world by fleeting conditional degrees of merit, in which women become the arbiters of whether or not a man’s merit can meet the demands of her seemingly insatiable hypergamy.
Men’s looks and athleticism will naturally decrease with age and are subject to disfigurement and disability. And money, power, and status are also providential blessings which can be fleeting, and are subject to robbery, rebellion, and slander. Who would truly want to restore such a great permanent responsibility to men if it only came with some slim degree of authority as conditionally judged by the caprice of fickle women, who assess their own competing merit with unwarranted vanity, and which could so easily be negated by so many factors beyond our control?
Ending the emasculating blasphemy against the Godhead, saying that “It” is a hermaphrodite, imaged by both men and women, is essential to deconstructing the foundation of presumed sexual equality which is the foundation of Feminism. We cannot rebuild a sturdy patriarchy upon the lie that men are categorically no better than women. Nor would it be much worth wasting the effort trying to establish a patriarchy where men’s superiority to women is only a fluctuating matter of degrees, where certain men are higher than certain women based only upon Looks, Athleticism, Money, Power, and Status (LAMPS).
Patriarchy has crumbled in the Western world as the inevitable result of the church having given away men’s divine birthright, “The image of God”, and its accompanying divine worthiness and reason to rule, to women.
Rollo is right in saying that blue-pilled untruthful notions of sexual equality have become false doctrines of the church. They have left off the recorded doctrine which Christ and the apostles first left with the churches, and they have turned aside to peddling Feminist lies.
With their tongues they praise God, even the Father; and therewith they also curse men, which are made after the similitude of God.James 3:9 (KJV)
We, men, need to take back our moral birthright, which is to be seen as categorically superior to all women in power and authority, being the only allowed earthly manifestation of God, having been made in God’s own image, graven from the dust of the earth by the Father of all Spirits and all flesh.
- Illimitable Men: The Hierarchy of Love (2015/6/1)
- The Rational Male: Losing My Religion (2016/8/30)
- Σ Frame (Jack): Do women possess moral agency? (2022/11/2)
- Σ Frame (Jack): Donal Graeme on Female Agency (2022/11/3)
- Σ Frame (Jack): Rollo Tomassi on Female Agency (2022/11/4)
- Σ Frame (Jack): Dalrock on Female Agency (2022/11/7)
- Σ Frame (Thedeti): Deti on Female Agency (2022/11/8)
- Σ Frame (Deep Strength, Jack): Deep Strength on Women’s Agency (2022/11/9)
- Catacomb Resident: The AntiChrist (2022/11/9)
- Σ Frame (Catacomb Resident, Jack): Catacomb Resident on Moral Agency (2022/11/11)
- Σ Frame (Jack): Artisanal Toad on Women’s Agency (2022/11/14)
- Σ Frame (Jack): Jack on Female Agency (2022/11/23)
- Σ Frame (Jack): Kyojiro Kagenuma on Women’s Agency (2022/12/5)
- Σ Frame (Jack): Zippy Catholic’s View of Female Hypoagency (2022/12/12)
- Σ Frame (Jack): Bruce Charlton on Agency (2022/12/13)
- Σ Frame (Red Pill Apostle): Red Pill Apostle on Women’s Moral Agency (2022/12/15)
- Σ Frame (Jack): D. Bradley on Women’s Moral Agency (2022/12/16)