A Nugget of Truth about China and Taiwan

A broader view of the China-Taiwan-U.S. situation.

Readership: Current residents of North America, i.e. the United States of America; Westerners; Those from China or Taiwan;
Reader’s Note: Today is a national holiday in Taiwan.
Length: 1,200 words
Reading Time: 4 minutes

More emails…

A reader directed me to this article from Andrew Anglin at The Unz Review, What About China, Then? (2021 October 5). He wrote,

“What Anglin says about China is rather what I suspected about what they are trying to do, and why. They are no real threat to the US, for the most part. And I rather doubt the folks where you live are very worried about reunification in the way it’s portrayed here. I sometimes wonder how the US became the Twilight Zone.”

Yeah. This article seems pretty accurate from the Asian perspective, and for those statements concerning Taiwan, it’s not too far off, at least.

Here’s an excerpt from Anglin’s piece that I found amusing.

“What will not happen: the Chinese will not invade America to enslave people in communism with their social credit system. If you think that the Chinese want to invade America and enslave people, then you basically need to accept that you just don’t really have any idea what is going on. Why would the Chinese want to invade and enslave Americans? Just to be mean? Do Chinese people strike you as that emotional, that they would waste huge amounts of resources in order to engage in an act of geopolitical meanness? The entire Chinese mindset, and their entire marketing strategy as a superpower, is that they don’t invade countries, and instead trade with countries and invest in countries’ infrastructure.”

Yeah, recasting the Chinese as world conquering Mongolian marauders is a drill bit of projection (think about that for a moment), similar to how the Germans were recast as barbaric Huns in WW1. More fear mongering fake news to watch out for. If the Chinese ever come to dominate the U.S., it will be through financial means of control.

Oh wait, they’ve already done that!

New York Stock Exchange, New York City — May 10, 2019.

Here’s another passage that strikes me as spot on.

“Though it is clear that the globalist agenda hinges on regime change in China, that rampant anti-Chinese propaganda abounds, and that the entire political and military apparatus in Washington supports using the military to “defend Taiwan,” the US plan to destroy the CCP is completely unclear.”

Isn’t it interesting that the U.S. is presumed to be the long arm of the globalist PTB?

“Right now, China is finally standing up and pushing back against this bullying. If they decided to “invade” Taiwan, the Taiwanese military would put up less of a fight than the Afghan military. Americans have no idea what is going on in Taiwan. I would be surprised if even one soldier fired a shot if the CCP military landed in Taipei, and at least 40% of the people would openly greet them as liberators. The people who are still against reunification in theory would just shrug, and carry on with their day.”

I believe this hypothetical is more true than not. Taiwan carried political and philosophical solidarity with Hong Kong during the crackdown back in June of this year, but little has been done about that, except to welcome disgruntled wealthy Hong Kongers looking for another Chinese cultural domain with a strong economy in which to take up residence. Property values in Taiwan have skyrocketed since then, and local landowners are quite happy about that.

“No one in Taiwan even understands the concept of the mainland “taking their freedoms.” No one thinks that anything substantial that affects them personally would change, other than gays and maybe some feminist women.”

In Taiwan, there is a lot more cohesive unity and social currency than in America. As a result, people’s idea of “freedom” is not the same as the American concept. In Taiwan, freedom means not being chained down like a wild animal or locked up in prison, but for those people who are in prison, they probably deserve to be. So what’s the fuss? Most Taiwanese can’t understand why Americans are so flagrant about “defending freedom”. Instead, the rhetoric is seen for what it is — mythological hype used to obscure other motives and justify military aggression.

“A lot of people want the CCP to come in and ban gay marriage. The US forcing the gay marriage thing really rustled a lot of people.”

A lot of people in Taiwan want to ban gay marriage, that’s true, but they aren’t expecting the CCP to do it. News sources have reported that “60% of Taiwanese are accepting of gay marriage”, and so on, but the use of the descriptors (e.g. “accepting of…”, “believe that…”, “say that…”) is misleading. People will be agreeable when asked, but it’s not how they really view the world, nor would they remain complacent if the person in question was their own family member. Here, “acceptance” means those who are against gay marriage have the attitude of, “Oh yes… heh… let them do their thing. They’ll learn sooner or later that it’s a dead end, and they’ll have nothing to show for it. Meanwhile, that has nothing to do with me, so kindly leave me out of it. I have my own fantastic life to live.” In other words, those gays who are outspoken are socially avoided and rejected from the social currency. This attitude has traction because about 70% of the population feels this way. We could also say Taiwanese are “tolerant”, but it’s different from the American concept of tolerance.

Next, Anglin locks in on the general sentiment of the Taiwanese — that life and business should not be disrupted by political ideologies and sentiments that are peripheral to daily life.

“Imagine the internet being flooded with videos of PRC troops landing in Taiwan and people either smiling and waving or just going about their business. Imagine the female president of Taiwan giving a public statement apologizing to the Chinese people for “disrespectful behaviors and mean-spirited actions.” Chuck Schumer and Ben Sasse could call a bipartisan press conference to release secret satellite photos of buildings in Taiwan that look shockingly similar to the infamous Hitler steam chambers. They could bring in the daughter of the Taiwanese ambassador to cry and say she saw CCP soldiers eating babies. But the jig would be up.”

A clash of two ideological worlds! Pass me the popcorn.

Seriously, the fear of violence is being used to stoke unnecessary hostility and resentment. Code words, “Freedom and Democracy” are abstract and illusory. Readers need to be aware of this.

The Chinese just want to make money and enjoy their lives and families. The average person in Taiwan is the same way. Meanwhile in America, civil discord is rife, elections are in disarray, and the average American is worried about misogyny, wearing masks, and using pronouns correctly.

Where’s the “freedom and democracy”?

Related

About Jack

Jack is a world traveling artist, skilled in trading ideas and information, none of which are considered too holy, too nerdy, nor too profane to hijack and twist into useful fashion. Sigma Frame Mindsets and methods for building and maintaining a masculine Frame
This entry was posted in China, Collective Strength, Communications, Conspiracy Theories, Cultural Differences, Culture Wars, Discerning Lies and Deception, Discernment, Wisdom, Elite Cultural Influences, Freedom, Personal Liberty, Fundamental Frame, Holding Frame, Homosexuality, International, Introspection, Media, Military, News Critique, Politics, Power, Reviews, Society, Taiwan, Zeitgeist Reports. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to A Nugget of Truth about China and Taiwan

  1. feeriker says:

    Imagine the female president of Taiwan giving a public statement apologizing to the Chinese people for “disrespectful behaviors and mean-spirited actions.”

    UGH. I really hope that the “female president” thing is a Globalist imposition upon Taiwan and not the result of the choice of the Taiwanese electorate.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Jack says:

      “I really hope that the “female president” thing is a Globalist imposition upon Taiwan…”

      There is definitely a significant American influence here of the bad sort, including gay rights, feminism, sexual promiscuity, etc. Not so in China. Most Taiwanese admire the U.S. and Japan as “successful countries” in terms of economy, power, and influence, and over the past century, Taiwan has received favorable treatment from these two countries. I do not know if Taiwan is directly controlled by globalists as in the west, or if this affinity is due to good relations in the past, but I tend to think it is the latter. Also there are many decision-makers in Taiwan who were educated in the west, further swaying general opinions.

      Like

    • Oscar says:

      @ feeriker

      Xi is a globalist.

      “China must be the builder of world peace and defender of the international order.” ~ Xi Jinping

      He’s just a different type of globalist.

      Like

      • feeriker says:

        Certainly. Communist = Globalist. It’s baked into the ideology.

        Like

      • Jack says:

        Feeriker wrote,

        “Communist = Globalist. It’s baked into the ideology.”

        It appears this way in theory, but the reality is much different. The way I view history, communism was a political tool used by globalists to destroy and restructure any nation that would fall for it. All the countries that went for communism in the 20th century (Albania, Cambodia, China, Congo, Cuba, Laos, Mongolia, Russia and its Soviet satellites, Somalia, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, et al.) are now consumed with the long hard task of rebuilding their societies and economies from the ashes. Interestingly, most of these post-communist states are now rejecting globalism. Hungary, Poland, Romania, and yes, China, are the most obvious examples. Communism has been pushed in the U.S. too, but up until the late 20th century, it was largely scorned by Americans. That attitude is slowly changing now that society is coming apart at the seams.

        Oscar wrote,

        “Xi is a globalist. […] He’s just a different type of globalist.”

        I would say Xi is a staunch nationalist with a strong regional and somewhat global consciousness. He’s not looking to establish a one world government as the globalists are. The type of globalism we are at odds with is the one that pushes goals and policies that favor socialism, liberal progressivism, feminism, trans stuff, and the “new world odor”, and work against cultural flourishing, masculinity, and national sovereignty. China doesn’t fit this description.

        Like

  2. Lastmod says:

    but if there is an “invasion” so to speak……..you can bet your bottom the USA will be EXPECTED hundreds of thousands if not more refugees from Taiwan “who could care less” about what the CCP does.

    Like

  3. Oscar says:

    “Reunification of the nation must be realized, and will definitely be realized. Reunification through a peaceful manner is the most in line with the overall interest of the Chinese nation, including Taiwan compatriots.” ~ Xi Jinping

    War is “using all means, including armed force or non-armed force, military and non-military, and lethal and non-lethal means to compel the enemy to accept one’s interests.” ~ Colonels Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui, Unrestricted Warfare

    I’m not sure that it can be made any clearer than that.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Jack says:

      “I’m not sure that it can be made any clearer than that.”

      I’ll point out that you’re using the definition of war from Unrestricted Warfare, which is somewhat different from our general impression of a “hot” war. Changing definitions doesn’t necessarily make things clearer.

      Like

      • Oscar says:

        “I’ll point out that you’re using the definition of war from Unrestricted Warfare, which is somewhat different from our general impression of a “hot” war. Changing definitions doesn’t necessarily make things clearer.”

        I’ll point out that understanding how your enemy thinks does make things clearer, if your willing to do it.

        I didn’t write Unrestricted Warfare, nor did I devise Chinese military doctrine. I have, however, tried to understand them, and I’m now sharing what the Chinese say about how the Chinese think. How, exactly, does that not make Chinese intentions clearer?

        I mean, seriously, they’re pretty much telling you what they’ve been doing, and are going to do. How does that not make things clearer?

        The enemy always gets a vote. How does knowing how they intend to vote not make things clearer?

        Liked by 1 person

  4. Pingback: Communications and Perspectives | Σ Frame

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s